Discussion:
Autism and Bob Dylan
(too old to reply)
really real
2008-09-23 13:42:59 UTC
Permalink
No one seems to know the reason for the current rise in autism rates
since the 1980s, but everyone knows it is a very serious problem. For
the parents of autistic children, autism is a terrible burden, and there
is much controversy about the different therapies that might or might
not help, and how society will pay for these very expensive therapies.
Recently there have been victims of autism who claim to have been cured,
and others who can describe what it's like to be autistic, and there are
even some who claim autism is a form of culture that should be
preserved. However, for almost every parent of autistic children, the
issue is how to get their kids to reach some kind of normalcy in their
lives.


And so far, science has not found the smoking gun that is causing the
increase in autism, as childhood vaccines, once thought to be the cause,
have been found safe in recent tests.

Wikepedia defines autism as "a brain development disorder that is
characterized by impaired social interaction and communication, and
restricted and repetitive behavior, all starting before a child is three
years old." Some researchers think of autism as a disease:

http://www.neuroimmunedr.com/present3/index.htm

but it seems to me that words like "disease" "disorder" and
"disability", in describing autism, are merely semantic differences.
Similarly, there is a blending of the difference between autism and its
milder form, Asperger's Syndrome, and of the related disorder of
Attention Deficit, or ADD.

There also seems to be a relationship between autism and genius. Think
of Dustin Hoffman in the Rain Man, with his incredible memory. Bill
Gates is thought to suffer from Asperger's. I noticed, watching Ray
Charles on the Dick Cavett show, how Ray couldn't sit still for a
minute. And then, the obvious next question is whether there is a
connection between Bob Dylan's genius and autism.


There seems to be something about great artists who have to put their
artistic endeavors ahead of the way they treat normal people. This was
the theme of Woody Allen's Sweet and Lowdown, where Sean Penn played a
jazz guitarist who felt he was above society's rules, which was a good
metaphor for Woody's behaviour at the time. Bob Dylan, and the way he
treats people, could make another example of autistic artistry.

The movie "I'm Not There" certainly centered on this theme, when the
Kate Blanchett Bob storms out of the limousine after being accused of
not caring about people. And the song itself, "I'm Not There" seems to
have the same theme. The singer in "I'm Not There" wants to care, but he
can't, because he isn't there. Is he somewhere else, or is he just not
connected?

A simple google of the words "Dylan autism" brought up this interesting
thread on the topic:

http://hometown.aol.co.uk/pa111111117/rita.html#Bob%20Dylan

Is Bob Dylan mildly Autistic?


Last night I watched part II of Martin Scorsese's documentary on Bob
Dylan: No Direction Home. I must say that it was well done. Scorsese did
an excellent job. Then main point that emerged from the documentary was
that Dylan was/is an artist who simply wanted/wants to write and sing
songs and above all, do it his way. When Dylan went electric, he risked it
all but emerged larger than life. Moreover, very candid interviews with
the present day Dylan seemed to suggest that he never had a political
agenda. Interviews with Joan Baez corroborated Dylan's apolitical
statements. I would have to say that your busking allows you the same
freedom that Dylan enjoys. Of course, if Dylan had been a lesser talent
and not believed in himself, he would have failed. I was also intrigued
by Dylan's answer to a question of what his art was all about. He
simply replied that he is merely trying to find his way home. I guess we
are all just trying to just find our way home.

Hi Mead! I'll have a think about that light issue. But now, I have a
question for your professional judgement:
Having watched that documentary, do you think Bob Dylan is mildly autistic?
In essence, I'm chewing on Asperger's Syndrone. My daughter has been
diagnosed as having this (though personally, and privately, I kinda
mistrust these sort of boxes and prefer private personality study). I
suspect, however, that if a box could be laid my way? I may also fall
somewhat into Aspergers.
Looking at that film, I could see Bob was entirely comfortable
communicating via the channel his autism enthused him toward. But he
seemed to embrace messages from the outside world only if he could apply
them to his autistic world. He seemed to understand why the words were
put into his songs and poetry, but he did not see any need to explain
why he put them there.
Beyond the channel of his autism, I do not think he even KNEW why he put
those words there.
I found the way to my daughter's mind was through the toy cars that she
loved. She just loves cars - and sees them as people in a way more real
than people. In fact, the way in which I introduced the outside world to
her was by relating it to the world she and I built with her toy cars.
If she were ever to become famous as a singer (or whatever) and was
faced by the kind of press meetings (and questions) that Bob
uncomfortably faced, I think she would re-act with the same genuine
confusion over trying to answer questions. Because it seemed Bob could
not make the connection that the issues aroused by the questions had
anything to do with his songs and the playing of music. He wrote a song
and moved on, seeing little need to explain meanings.... possibly
because he couldn't. Everything he had wanted to say was in the song and
belonged harmonically within the channelled world his autism accepted.
Neither his modern day comments, nor his press and radio responses from
the 60's, seemed contrived in any shape or form. He seemed genuinely
confused by what he was being asked.
The years have given him an improved form of expression outside of his
autistic world.
I share his view on art and creativity, in that spending months trying
to perfect a song and package it neatly is anathema. Could have written
a few songs in that time - and some of these would excite a greater
personal interest. All of the transformations of Bob over the years in
his style, genre and presentation fitted neatly into his own imagined
world. He could not explain how they would fit into other people's worlds.
He did not see there was a reason to do this anyway.
He looked at the outside world with his art - and took a 'photograph' of
it. But he could not easily explain why there was a bird in the picture
flying in the distance, even though he was aware of it as he took the
photograph. He could see where it fitted in the picture and the soul
within recognised its crucial relevance to the picture as a whole. For
him, that was enough.
He could not articulate the relevance of that bird to those outside his
world - or even (possibly) to those inside his world.
Autism would render him as a loner, an outsider. There will always be
parts of him the world will never see, nor understand.
So, back to the question:
Do you think Bob Dylan is mildly autistic?

Brian,

I finally have time to answer you question on Dylan. First, we must
examine the criteria for a diagnosis of autism:

1) Impaired reciprocal social interaction relative to developmental level.

2) Impaired verbal and nonverbal communication relative to developmental
level.

3) Abnormally intense and narrow interests.

These individuals often exhibit little eye contact, usually have problems
dealing with social situations, and very often exhibit an obsession with a
certain subject matter like puzzles or numbers. [or writing ten thousand
page journals-just a joke, Brian]!

Studies indicate that a number of artists and mathematicians exhibit
symptoms of autism or in some cases they are autistic.

Focusing in on Dylan. Dylan was a master writer of poems/songs and
apparently interested in little else. Through his gift of verse/song he
was able to create his own abstract world. Which I am sure was very
comforting for him. When you apply the above criteria to Dylan, he was/is
obviously autistic. Otherwise, he would not have created his beautiful and
haunting songs. I can imagine a world without Mr. Tambourine Man, Chimes
Of Freedom, and Like A Rolling Stone but it would be a far less beautiful
world. Think of all the beauty Dylan and his autistic world has given us.

My undergraduate degree was in mathematics and I found it to be very
comforting. Solving a problem or proving a theorem is much like writing
a haiku or a song. One can have order and beauty in an abstract world
which is not subject to the denigration of reality. Anytime , I
experienced a setback, I could always retreat to the safety of the world
of mathematics.

I hope that I have answered your question on Dylan. I am posting the first
two chapters of [Autism : Explaining the Enigma] by Uta Frith, one of the
world's foremost experts on autism. By the way, she is Professor of
Cognitive Development at The Institute of Neuroscience at University
College, London. If you like her writing, check the book out or buy a
copy. I am also posting a copy of {Autism in Mathematicians} by Ioan
James from The Mathematical Intelligencer 2003.

"It seems that for success in science or art a dash of autism is
essential."-Hans Asperger.
CurrentOccupant_dudley
2008-09-23 16:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
No one seems to know the reason
<snipt>
Post by really real
do you think Bob Dylan is mildly autistic?
In essence, I'm chewing on Asperger's Syndrone.
Previous posts 'round hear re autism/Asperger:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.dylan/browse_thread/thread/f640832527657952/1edffdaa6da78349?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#1edffdaa6da78349

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.dylan/browse_thread/thread/f640832527657952/1edffdaa6da78349?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#1edffdaa6da78349

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.dylan/browse_thread/thread/7b194b0c82477672/7052d49b264f4f9d?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#7052d49b264f4f9d

If these links fail, let me know, i'll attempt to emend them.
Post by really real
"It seems that for success in science or art a dash of autism is
essential."-Hans Asperger.
there's no suckCess like failure,

dashingly,
dudley
___
"If it's not the fucking incoming it's the fucking outgoing. The only
fucking difference is who gets the grease, and that ain't no fucking
difference at all."
Dispatches, Michael Herr
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-23 17:37:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Focusing in on Dylan. Dylan was a master writer of poems/songs and
apparently interested in little else. Through his gift of verse/song he
was able to create his own abstract world. Which I am sure was very
comforting for him. When you apply the above criteria to Dylan, he was/is
obviously autistic. Otherwise, he would not have created his beautiful and
haunting songs. I can imagine a world without Mr. Tambourine Man, Chimes
Of Freedom, and Like A Rolling Stone but it would be a far less beautiful
world. Think of all the beauty Dylan and his autistic world has given us.
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one. Could it be that Dylan's
reported social akwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display? Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal? The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality. We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends". Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.

Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.

Temporary
really real
2008-09-23 17:49:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one. Could it be that Dylan's
reported social awkwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display? Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal? The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality. We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends". Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.
But whom are we to believe, people who talk about Bob Dylan, or Bob
Dylan, when he talks about himself. There is much in Chronicles that
didn't ring true to my ears.

What kind of guy would write "I'll say this, I don't give a damn about
your dreams "
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-23 18:13:37 UTC
Permalink
What kind of guy would write  "I'll say this, I don't give a damn about
your dreams "
Ummmm ... The same kind of guy who says "Gonna forget about myself for
a while, gonna go out and see what others need"? We could trade lines
back and forth 'til the mule's in the stall, and that would prove
nothing. Besides, as anyone who has taught literature or studied
literature knows, it is the *persona* not the author whom we
encounter.

Temporary
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-23 17:48:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Focusing in on Dylan. Dylan was a master writer of poems/songs and
apparently interested in little else. Through his gift of verse/song he
was able to create his own abstract world. Which I am sure was very
comforting for him. When you apply the above criteria to Dylan, he was/is
obviously autistic. Otherwise, he would not have created his beautiful and
haunting songs. I can imagine a world without Mr. Tambourine Man, Chimes
Of Freedom, and Like A Rolling Stone but it would be a far less beautiful
world. Think of all the beauty Dylan and his autistic world has given us.
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one. Could it be that Dylan's
reported social akwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display? Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal? The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality. We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends". Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.

Autism and Asperger's are terms that are being bandied about by a lot
of people these days to "explain" behaviours. It's being done by
people who should know better and by people who don't; they are
flavours of the month. There are *physiological* symptoms that
accompany the behavioural signs autism and Asperger's; Dylan exhibits
none of them.

Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.

Temporary
kerry
2008-09-23 21:45:41 UTC
Permalink
On Sep 23, 10:48 am, Temporary Like Achilles
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Post by really real
Focusing in on Dylan. Dylan was a master writer of poems/songs and
apparently interested in little else. Through his gift of verse/song he
was able to create his own abstract world. Which I am sure was very
comforting for him. When you apply the above criteria to Dylan, he was/is
obviously autistic. Otherwise, he would not have created his beautiful and
haunting songs. I can imagine a world without Mr. Tambourine Man, Chimes
Of Freedom, and Like A Rolling Stone but it would be a far less beautiful
world. Think of all the beauty Dylan and his autistic world has given us.
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one.  Could it be that Dylan's
reported social akwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display?  Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal?  The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality.  We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends".  Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.
Autism and Asperger's are terms that are being bandied about by a lot
of people these days to "explain" behaviours.  It's being done by
people who should know better and by people who don't; they are
flavours of the month.  There are *physiological* symptoms that
accompany the behavioural signs autism and Asperger's; Dylan exhibits
none of them.
Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise.  He is, however, very
artistic.
Temporary
My thoughts exactly...unless you are willing to argue that every
single genius that we have ever known, artistic or otherwise, has a
form of mental illness, but really, the only true way of knowing, in
my extremely limited knowledge, is to go back to their childhood and
find out if they had all the earmarks of autism then... I don't have
much time right now to back up any of my assertions, but from my hazy
recollection of interviews I have read by his parents and other people
that knew him as a young child, he seemed to be very social, outgoing,
performed at a very young age willingly in front of relatives and
neighbors, etc, and was all around a fairly typical, (besides his
obvious talent for singing) young kid...I think the combination of his
unique talent, inherent gemini personality, and the pressures of the
intense invasion of his personal life to an unimaginable degree, plus
his mercurial artistic temperment and the constant pressure (both
internally and externally) for continuously wanting More from him all
combine to make him uniquely who and what he is...and thank Bob for
that!!
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-23 17:59:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Focusing in on Dylan. Dylan was a master writer of poems/songs and
apparently interested in little else. Through his gift of verse/song he
was able to create his own abstract world. Which I am sure was very
comforting for him. When you apply the above criteria to Dylan, he was/is
obviously autistic. Otherwise, he would not have created his beautiful and
haunting songs. I can imagine a world without Mr. Tambourine Man, Chimes
Of Freedom, and Like A Rolling Stone but it would be a far less beautiful
world. Think of all the beauty Dylan and his autistic world has given us.
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one. Could it be that Dylan's
reported social akwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display? Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal? The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality. We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends". Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.

Autism and Asperger's are terms that are being bandied about by a lot
of people these days to "explain" behaviours. It's being done by
people who should know better and by people who don't; they are
flavours of the month. There are *physiological* symptoms that
accompany the behavioural signs autism and Asperger's; Dylan exhibits
none of them.

Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.

Temporary
really real
2008-09-24 01:10:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.
Of course Dylan isn't autistic. I'm surprised that you feel the need to
defend Dylan from this charge.

But isn't Dylan sort of a little autistic, at least sometimes? It seems
to me, a lot of people are a little autistic. Like dividing the world
between introverts and extroverts, I sort of see that most people are
either a bit autistic, or a bit over-empathetic.


And when is Dylan's music at its best? When Dylan is being un empathetic
or when he's being gushy?
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
If you read "Chronicles", you will see evidence of the width and depth
of Dylan's interests in a variety of areas. You will also read his
accounts of many conversations and social interactions with many
different people, usually one-on-one. Could it be that Dylan's
reported social akwardness and "shyness" with groups of people are
simply the by-product of his fame, and his awareness that he is in a
very real sense on display? Could it be that Dylan simply had a goal
-- to succeed as a musician -- and had the will, strength of purpose
and genius to attain his goal? The fact is that we really know
nothing about Dylan's personal life or personality. We rely on second-
hand accounts of his life and anecdotes from "friends". Van Morrison
has it right when he mentions the people who "knew [him] when" and who
provide information for biographies, and asks why they have such good
memories when he can't remember last week.
Autism and Asperger's are terms that are being bandied about by a lot
of people these days to "explain" behaviours. It's being done by
people who should know better and by people who don't; they are
flavours of the month. There are *physiological* symptoms that
accompany the behavioural signs autism and Asperger's; Dylan exhibits
none of them.
Dylan isn't autistic, slightly or otherwise. He is, however, very
artistic.
Temporary
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-24 12:36:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Of course Dylan isn't autistic. I'm surprised that you feel the need to
defend Dylan from this charge.
But isn't Dylan sort of a little autistic, at least sometimes?
Interesting. You use the words "defend" and "charge" in relation to
the autism you at first stated Dylan demonstrates; then, in your most
recent post, you stated he isn't autistic; then, again in your most
recent post, you suggested he's a little autistic. (Is that like a
woman being a little bit pregnant?) Are autistic people, in your
opinion, guilty of something? Is it, for you, unimportant to decide
precisely what word to use to describe their "crime"?

You have stated that you are a former English teacher. You also state
over and over that science is essential and enthusiastically, to say
the least, promote teaching it. You state that people must learn
about science. Then you come out with this nonsense.

What the hell is wrong with you?

Temporary
really real
2008-09-24 13:19:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Interesting. You use the words "defend" and "charge" in relation to
the autism you at first stated Dylan demonstrates; then, in your most
recent post, you stated he isn't autistic; then, again in your most
recent post, you suggested he's a little autistic. (Is that like a
woman being a little bit pregnant?) Are autistic people, in your
opinion, guilty of something? Is it, for you, unimportant to decide
precisely what word to use to describe their "crime"?
The article I posted was wondering if Dylan was mildly autistic. People
who are a little bit autistic are said to have Asperger's Syndrome

I'll say it again. I think that many people tend to be a bit on the
autistic side. I tend to think there is a link between being a bit
autistic and being creative. I guess you could say I feel that some
people are guilty of not being autistic enough.
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
You have stated that you are a former English teacher. You also state
over and over that science is essential and enthusiastically, to say
the least, promote teaching it. You state that people must learn
about science. Then you come out with this nonsense.
What the hell is wrong with you?
As an English teacher, I taught a lot of poetry and listened to a lot of
Bob Dylan, where I learned how words could have multiple meanings. I
guess what's wrong with me is that I don't know how to relate to people
whose brains and minds are too linear.
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-24 16:11:55 UTC
Permalink
I
Post by really real
guess what's wrong with me is that I don't know how to relate to people
whose brains and minds are too linear.
Admitting there is something wrong with you is a good first step.
Your problem, however, has nothing to do with other people's manner of
thought. In this instance, you have two problems:

1) You hurt another person's feelings and lack the ability to
apologize appropriately; instead, you start a new thread in which you
attempt to obfuscate the original injury and responses.

2) You made a mistake and lack the intellectual capacity or honesty to
acknowledge that you are wrong.

I have found that people who accuse others of being "too linear"
generally, though not invariably, are really complaining that the
other people will not join them when they make an intuitive
intellectual leap. I have also found that generally, though again not
invariably, those people lack sufficient knowledge of the subject to
support their "insights". There is nothing wrong with making
intuitive intellectual leaps, of course: the best minds do it when
they come up with a discovery, form a new paradigm, or create
something. Their "intuititve leap", however, is really the product of
a solid grounding in the basics of their field and, in the case of
science for example, logic and experimentation.

I don't want to insult you, but I think you should ask yourself if you
really know enough about autism and Asperger's Syndrome as well as the
differences between such words as "disease", "disorder" and
"disability" to make your comments. Why don't you just draw a line
under this issue? You don't need to make a production number of it,
but it might do you yourself some good.

Temporary
really real
2008-09-24 17:01:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Admitting there is something wrong with you is a good first step.
Your problem, however, has nothing to do with other people's manner of
1) You hurt another person's feelings and lack the ability to
apologize appropriately; instead, you start a new thread in which you
attempt to obfuscate the original injury and responses.
2) You made a mistake and lack the intellectual capacity or honesty to
acknowledge that you are wrong.
I thought I did apologize properly. The real issue was, I think, about
making jokes about autism. Obviously I wouldn't make such jokes if I
knew someone was rightfully sensitive about the issue.

But autism is a subject I'm very interested in. Whether it is a disease
or not, is something I learned about from reading that thread someone
wrote about Dylan and autism.

I'm quite aware of the problems of my own inner autism. I'm just happy
to see that Dylan can be seen to share some of these problems as well,
at least in some people's eyes. You jumped in to state that being a
little bit autistic is as wrong as saying someone is a little bit
pregnant. Who can't admit they are wrong on this point?
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
I have found that people who accuse others of being "too linear"
generally, though not invariably, are really complaining that the
other people will not join them when they make an intuitive
intellectual leap. I have also found that generally, though again not
invariably, those people lack sufficient knowledge of the subject to
support their "insights". There is nothing wrong with making
intuitive intellectual leaps, of course: the best minds do it when
they come up with a discovery, form a new paradigm, or create
something. Their "intuititve leap", however, is really the product of
a solid grounding in the basics of their field and, in the case of
science for example, logic and experimentation.
I don't want to insult you, but I think you should ask yourself if you
really know enough about autism and Asperger's Syndrome as well as the
differences between such words as "disease", "disorder" and
"disability" to make your comments. Why don't you just draw a line
under this issue? You don't need to make a production number of it,
but it might do you yourself some good.
Temporary
Temporary Like Achilles
2008-09-25 00:38:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Admitting there is something wrong with you is a good first step.
Your problem, however, has nothing to do with other people's manner of
1) You hurt another person's feelings and lack the ability to
apologize appropriately; instead, you start a new thread in which you
attempt to obfuscate the original injury and responses.
2) You made a mistake and lack the intellectual capacity or honesty to
acknowledge that you are wrong.
I thought I did apologize properly. The real issue was, I think, about
making jokes about autism. Obviously I wouldn't make such jokes if I
knew someone was rightfully sensitive about the issue.
But autism is a subject I'm very interested in. Whether it is a disease
or not, is something I learned about from reading that thread someone
wrote about Dylan and autism.
I'm quite aware of the problems of my own inner autism. I'm just happy
to see that Dylan can be seen to share some of these problems as well,
at least in some people's eyes. You jumped in to state that being a
little bit autistic is as wrong as saying someone is a little bit
pregnant. Who can't admit they are wrong on this point?
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
I have found that people who accuse others of being "too linear"
generally, though not invariably, are really complaining that the
other people will not join them when they make an intuitive
intellectual leap.  I have also found that generally, though again not
invariably, those people lack sufficient knowledge of the subject to
support their "insights".  There is nothing wrong with making
intuitive intellectual leaps, of course:  the best minds do it when
they come up with a discovery, form a new paradigm, or create
something.  Their "intuititve leap", however, is really the product of
a solid grounding in the basics of their field and, in the case of
science for example, logic and experimentation.
I don't want to insult you, but I think you should ask yourself if you
really know enough about autism and Asperger's Syndrome as well as the
differences between such words as "disease", "disorder" and
"disability" to make your comments.  Why don't you just draw a line
under this issue?  You don't need to make a production number of it,
but it might do you yourself some good.
Temporary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh, well, I tried ...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(line drawn under)

Trmporary
Jumbo
2008-09-26 22:03:37 UTC
Permalink
On Sep 25, 1:38 am, Temporary Like Achilles
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Post by really real
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
Admitting there is something wrong with you is a good first step.
Your problem, however, has nothing to do with other people's manner of
1) You hurt another person's feelings and lack the ability to
apologize appropriately; instead, you start a new thread in which you
attempt to obfuscate the original injury and responses.
2) You made a mistake and lack the intellectual capacity or honesty to
acknowledge that you are wrong.
I thought I did apologize properly. The real issue was, I think, about
making jokes about autism. Obviously I wouldn't make such jokes if I
knew someone was rightfully sensitive about the issue.
But autism is a subject I'm very interested in. Whether it is a disease
or not, is something I learned about from reading that thread someone
wrote about Dylan and autism.
I'm quite aware of the problems of my own inner autism. I'm just happy
to see that Dylan can be seen to share some of these problems as well,
at least in some people's eyes. You jumped in to state that being a
little bit autistic is as wrong as saying someone is a little bit
pregnant. Who can't admit they are wrong on this point?
Post by Temporary Like Achilles
I have found that people who accuse others of being "too linear"
generally, though not invariably, are really complaining that the
other people will not join them when they make an intuitive
intellectual leap.  I have also found that generally, though again not
invariably, those people lack sufficient knowledge of the subject to
support their "insights".  There is nothing wrong with making
intuitive intellectual leaps, of course:  the best minds do it when
they come up with a discovery, form a new paradigm, or create
something.  Their "intuititve leap", however, is really the product of
a solid grounding in the basics of their field and, in the case of
science for example, logic and experimentation.
I don't want to insult you, but I think you should ask yourself if you
really know enough about autism and Asperger's Syndrome as well as the
differences between such words as "disease", "disorder" and
"disability" to make your comments.  Why don't you just draw a line
under this issue?  You don't need to make a production number of it,
but it might do you yourself some good.
Temporary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Oh, well, I tried ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
(line drawn under)
You did try, Temporary, and it's very much appreciated. You're a good
person.

I know I was silly to respond the way I did to really real.

I once saw someone on here call him some names. At the time I didn't
get it, now I do. And I understand that he has skewed standards. But,
you know, it's all part of the deal.

Having said I wouldn't post again, I intend to stick to that. For 6
months at least. Cos I think it's a healthy thing to do.

So ... I'm going away for a while, not in a huff. Just cos sometimes
it's a good idea.

Thanks to Martin as well and poisoned rose as well for saying what
they said.

poisoned rose
2008-09-23 19:36:53 UTC
Permalink
Wow. So I guess Don is even going to start baiting about autism now.
Talk about not knowing when to quit.
Martin
2008-09-23 19:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by poisoned rose
Wow. So I guess Don is even going to start baiting about autism now.
Talk about not knowing when to quit
I do think it shows considerable insensitivity. Is this the kind of
rebuff that Jumbo wanted, do you think? Offering the view that 'words
like "disease" "disorder" and
"disability", in describing autism, are merely semantic differences'.
Oh well, it was nice having him here.

On the subject of Dylan's potential for diagnosis of Asperger's, I'm
totally with Temporary. There is nothing, in my view, in Bob's
mannerisms and personality than his own quirky persona. He seems to
change frequently, even now in his 60's he can appear relaxed and easy
going one minute, then tense and shifty the next. I'd guess a good
proportion of the population has these characteristics too. I also
think that the comment 'What kind of guy would write "I'll say this,
I don't give a damn about your dreams' sounds dismissive of people
with autism, as well as giving no basis for the argument whatsoever
really real
2008-09-23 23:39:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Martin
Post by poisoned rose
Wow. So I guess Don is even going to start baiting about autism now.
Talk about not knowing when to quit
I do think it shows considerable insensitivity. Is this the kind of
rebuff that Jumbo wanted, do you think? Offering the view that 'words
like "disease" "disorder" and
"disability", in describing autism, are merely semantic differences'.
Oh well, it was nice having him here.
I don't know why you and Eric are trying to make things worse between
Jumbo and me. You, Martin, are the one who doesn't know when to stop and
when not to but in.

Eric of course, is on a vendetta against me, and as usual, he's beyond
his depth in this issue.

Jumbo took great exception at me calling autism a disease. I thought
some people might be interesting in seeing that guy's site about why he
thinks it is a disease. I'm still not sure about the semamtic
implications between a disease, a disorder and a disability.
Post by Martin
On the subject of Dylan's potential for diagnosis of Asperger's, I'm
totally with Temporary. There is nothing, in my view, in Bob's
mannerisms and personality than his own quirky persona. He seems to
change frequently, even now in his 60's he can appear relaxed and easy
going one minute, then tense and shifty the next. I'd guess a good
proportion of the population has these characteristics too. I also
think that the comment 'What kind of guy would write "I'll say this,
I don't give a damn about your dreams' sounds dismissive of people
with autism, as well as giving no basis for the argument whatsoever
poisoned rose
2008-09-23 23:58:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
Jumbo took great exception at me calling autism a disease. I thought
some people might be interesting in seeing that guy's site about why he
thinks it is a disease. I'm still not sure about the semamtic
implications between a disease, a disorder and a disability.
Talk about not knowing when to quit.
poisoned rose
2008-09-24 00:05:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
I thought
some people might be interesting in seeing that guy's site about why he
thinks it is a disease.
I think some people would be interested in seeing you slapped with a
dung-filled sock. Can you help with that too?
Martin
2008-09-24 09:05:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by really real
I don't know why you and Eric are trying to make things worse between
Jumbo and me. You, Martin, are the one who doesn't know when to stop and
when not to but in
You're right, I'm a sucker for a well made argument, complete with
examples. I'd be happy to consider your argument if you were making
one I could understand. You may as well suggest that Bob Dylan could
be slightly deaf in one ear, or be suffering from arthritis or
irritable bowel syndrome; there's no evidence he has those conditions
either. My defense of Jumbo is in the face of your decision - having
incorrectly (as I understand it) referred to Autism as a disease
rather than a disorder - to post a lengthy article on the subject.
The subject of Autism has been discussed here in the past - as Dudley
pointed out - and I just think it's hugely insensitive to Jumbo for
you to continue badgering RMD with it. It just seems like hostile,
unnecessary baiting. But even if it isn't, your 'argument' seems to
be non existant:

'Of course Dylan isn't autistic.

But isn't Dylan sort of a little autistic..?'

What the hell are you talking about ??
Gemini Jackson
2008-09-24 12:54:57 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:05:53 -0700 (PDT), Martin
Post by Martin
Post by really real
I don't know why you and Eric are trying to make things worse between
Jumbo and me. You, Martin, are the one who doesn't know when to stop and
when not to but in
You're right, I'm a sucker for a well made argument, complete with
examples. I'd be happy to consider your argument if you were making
one I could understand. You may as well suggest that Bob Dylan could
be slightly deaf in one ear, or be suffering from arthritis or
irritable bowel syndrome; there's no evidence he has those conditions
either. My defense of Jumbo is in the face of your decision - having
incorrectly (as I understand it) referred to Autism as a disease
rather than a disorder - to post a lengthy article on the subject.
The subject of Autism has been discussed here in the past - as Dudley
pointed out - and I just think it's hugely insensitive to Jumbo for
you to continue badgering RMD with it. It just seems like hostile,
unnecessary baiting. But even if it isn't, your 'argument' seems to
'Of course Dylan isn't autistic.
But isn't Dylan sort of a little autistic..?'
What the hell are you talking about ??
These arm-chair diagnosis from people who think they have a clue are
best ignored. You can't argue with a wall and you can't get an
education from google. Maybe ignorance is a disease.
-GJ
chris
2008-09-23 20:38:52 UTC
Permalink
gee, and he seems so normal on Theme Time Radio Hour..:-). i feel I
get all the 'Bob talkin to me' I could ever wish for on those shows,
and I'll take that talkin to interview spewing or show chatter.

nah, i won't be putting mr. bobbie in some little labeled box with
it's perfect little explanation...lol.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...